Brown v. Singletary

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Brown v. Singletary

616 So. 2d 1105, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3869, 1993 WL 102173

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 8, 1993

DocketNo. 92-3801

StatusPublished

This text of 616 So. 2d 1105 (Brown v. Singletary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brown v. Singletary, 616 So. 2d 1105, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3869, 1993 WL 102173 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant sought mandamus relief in the trial court seeking an award of provisional gain time credits. The petition was summarily denied without issuance of an order to show cause. Appellee now moves for relinquishment of jurisdiction stating that although appellee believes the trial court’s ruling was correct, the reason for the denial may not be apparent from the face of the petition. Appellee seeks relinquishment so that the trial court may issue an order to show cause to allow appellee to clarify the record and respond to the merits of the petition.

We elect to treat appellee’s motion to relinquish as a confession of error. This cause is reversed and remanded for further proceedings in the trial court.

JOANOS, C.J., and BARFIELD and MICKLE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant sought mandamus relief in the trial court seeking an award of provisional gain time credits. The petition was summarily denied without issuance of an order to show cause. Appellee now moves for relinquishment of jurisdiction stating that although appellee believes the trial court’s ruling was correct, the reason for the denial may not be apparent from the face of the petition. Appellee seeks relinquishment so that the trial court may issue an order to show cause to allow appellee to clarify the record and respond to the merits of the petition.

We elect to treat appellee’s motion to relinquish as a confession of error. This cause is reversed and remanded for further proceedings in the trial court.

JOANOS, C.J., and BARFIELD and MICKLE, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

616 So. 2d 1105, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3869, 1993 WL 102173, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-singletary-fladistctapp-1993.