Brown v. Singh

52 A.D.3d 367, 858 N.Y.S.2d 885
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 19, 2008·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Howard R. Silver, J.), entered September 21, 2007, which denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that plaintiff did not suffer a “serious injury” within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d), unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion granted and the complaint dismissed. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

Plaintiff offered no explanation for the absence of any evidence that he underwent any medical treatment or physical therapy in the five years since he was examined, X-rayed and released by the hospital emergency room immediately after the automobile accident in which he claims to have sustained “serious injury.” In addition, the report of a physician who examined plaintiff more than five years after the accident was too remote in time to show any contemporaneous range of motion limitations in his cervical and lumbar spine resulting from the accident, and therefore fails to raise an issue of fact as to whether his injuries were permanent or significant (see Thompson v Ramnarine, 40 AD3d 360 [2007]). Concur—Tom, J.P, Andrias, Nardelli and Sweeny, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. Singh, 52 A.D.3d 367, 858 N.Y.S.2d 885 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

52 A.D.3d 367 (Brown v. Singh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lake v. Celen
27 Misc. 3d 284 (New York Supreme Court, 2009)