Brown v. Shearer
This text of 358 P.2d 800 (Brown v. Shearer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— This, allegedly, is a taxpayer’s lawsuit to prevent an improper use of public funds.
The plaintiff, manager of a title insurance company in Lewis County, relying upon Smith v. Lamping (1902), 27 Wash. 624, 68 Pac. 195, and Dirks v. Collin (1905), 37 Wash. 620, 79 Pac. 1112, asks (a) that the auditor and the commis[618]*618sioners of Lewis County be enjoined from keeping certain records.< (referred to by the parties as “Tract Indices”
The trial court entered findings of fact to the effect that public funds were not being nor about to be expended in maintaining the tract indices. There is evidence in the record to support this -finding. Thus, as we have said in numerous cases, we accept and adopt this finding as a verity; i.e., as an established fact for the purposes of this appeal. The decisions in the Lamping and Collin cases were based upon an anticipated or an actual and continuing improper expenditure of public funds. We are convinced this is a significant distinction, and that the above-cited cases are not controlling in the instant case. We agree , with the trial court’s conclusions of law. The judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. It is so ordered.
Hill, Weaver, Rosellini, and Foster, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
358 P.2d 800, 57 Wash. 2d 617, 1961 Wash. LEXIS 410, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-shearer-wash-1961.