Brown v. Sears Holding Management Corp.

Fourth Circuit

Brown v. Sears Holding Management Corp.

588 F. App'x 282

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 22, 2014·No. No. 14-1852·Published

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Calvin Earl Brown appeals the district court’s order denying his motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and for appointment of counsel and order denying his motion for reconsideration. The denial of in forma pauperis status is immediately appealable. Roberts v. U.S. Dist. Ct., 339 U.S. 844, 845, 70 S.Ct. 954, 94 L.Ed. 1326 (1950) (per curiam). We have reviewed the record and conclude the appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal and dismiss the district court’s orders for the reasons stated by the district court. Brown v. Sears Holding Mgmt. Corp., No. 4:14-cv-00033-D (E.D.N.C. July 21 & Aug. 1, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Calvin Earl Brown appeals the district court’s order denying his motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and for appointment of counsel and order denying his motion for reconsideration. The denial of in forma pauperis status is immediately appealable. Roberts v. U.S. Dist. Ct., 339 U.S. 844, 845, 70 S.Ct. 954, 94 L.Ed. 1326 (1950) (per curiam). We have reviewed the record and conclude the appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal and dismiss the district court’s orders for the reasons stated by the district court. Brown v. Sears Holding Mgmt. Corp., No. 4:14-cv-00033-D (E.D.N.C. July 21 & Aug. 1, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Brown v. Sears Holding Management Corp., 588 F. App'x 282 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

588 F. App'x 282 (Brown v. Sears Holding Management Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related