Brown v. Sears Automotive Center

338 F. App'x 345
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 15, 2009·No. No. 09-1302·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Earl Brown appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his civil action as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brown v. Sears Automotive Center, Nos. 1:08-cv-00690-JAB-PTS; 1:01-cv-00067-JAB (M.D.N.C. Feb. 10, 2009). Although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. Sears Automotive Center, 338 F. App'x 345 (4th Cir. 2009).

338 F. App'x 345 (Brown v. Sears Automotive Center) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Proceedings in forma pauperis
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)