Brown v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad

Supreme Court of Georgia

Brown v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad

192 S.E.2d 382, 229 Ga. 481, 1972 Ga. LEXIS 658

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedSeptember 7, 1972

Docket27291

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 192 S.E.2d 382 (Brown v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brown v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad, 192 S.E.2d 382, 229 Ga. 481, 1972 Ga. LEXIS 658 (Ga. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

Undercofler, Justice.

The Court of Appeals certified the ' following question for decision by this court: "May the courts of this State apply the doctrine of forum non conveniens to an action under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act properly brought in a court in this State by a citizen of another State on a cause of action originating in yet another State, so as. to refuse to exercise its juris *482 diction and dismiss without prejudice the action so brought?” Held:

Argued June 14, 1972 Decided September 7, 1972 Rehearing denied September 25, 1972.

"A decision by the highest court of a State determining that the doctrine of forum non conveniens cannot bar an action based on the Federal Employers’ .Liability Act, in the circumstances before us, m^y rest' on one of three theories ... (2) By reason of the Privileges-and-Immunities Clause of the Constitution, a State may not discriminate against citizens of sister States. Art. IV, §2. Therefore Missouri cannot allow suits by non-resident Missourians for liability under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act arising^ out of conduct outside that State and discriminatorily deny access to its courts to a nonresident who is a citizen of another State.” Southern Railway Co. v. Mayfield, 340 U. S. 1, 3 (71 SC 1, 95 LE 3).

Georgia citizens are entitled "to appeal to the courts” unless "specially prohibited by law.” Code §§ 79-205, 79-206. In our opinion this includes all Georgia citizens whether resident or nonresident. Code § 79-202. There is no law authorizing the courts of this State to decline to exercise jurisdiction of Federal Employers’ Liability suits brought by nonresident Georgia citizens on actions arising out of the State. On the contrary, under the quoted Code sections, Georgia courts are required to entertain them. Therefore, the privileges and immunities clause of the United States Constitution (Art. IV, Sec. II, Par. I; Code § 1-402) prohibits Georgia courts from applying such doctrine to citizens of other States who are nonresidents of Georgia in Federal Employers’ Liability Act cases and declining to exercise jurisdiction of such suits brought by them. Southern Railway Company v. Mayfield, supra.

Certified question is answered in the negative.

All the Justices concur. *483 Parks & Eisenberg, David S. Eisenberg, for appellant. Troutman, Sanders, Lockerman & Ashmore, Robert L. Pennington, Jeffrey R. Nickerson, for appellee. Neely, Freeman & Hawkins, Edgar A. Neely, Jr., amicus curiae.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Undercofler, Justice.

The Court of Appeals certified the ' following question for decision by this court: "May the courts of this State apply the doctrine of forum non conveniens to an action under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act properly brought in a court in this State by a citizen of another State on a cause of action originating in yet another State, so as. to refuse to exercise its juris *482 diction and dismiss without prejudice the action so brought?” Held:

Argued June 14, 1972 Decided September 7, 1972 Rehearing denied September 25, 1972.

"A decision by the highest court of a State determining that the doctrine of forum non conveniens cannot bar an action based on the Federal Employers’ .Liability Act, in the circumstances before us, m^y rest' on one of three theories ... (2) By reason of the Privileges-and-Immunities Clause of the Constitution, a State may not discriminate against citizens of sister States. Art. IV, §2. Therefore Missouri cannot allow suits by non-resident Missourians for liability under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act arising^ out of conduct outside that State and discriminatorily deny access to its courts to a nonresident who is a citizen of another State.” Southern Railway Co. v. Mayfield, 340 U. S. 1, 3 (71 SC 1, 95 LE 3).

Georgia citizens are entitled "to appeal to the courts” unless "specially prohibited by law.” Code §§ 79-205, 79-206. In our opinion this includes all Georgia citizens whether resident or nonresident. Code § 79-202. There is no law authorizing the courts of this State to decline to exercise jurisdiction of Federal Employers’ Liability suits brought by nonresident Georgia citizens on actions arising out of the State. On the contrary, under the quoted Code sections, Georgia courts are required to entertain them. Therefore, the privileges and immunities clause of the United States Constitution (Art. IV, Sec. II, Par. I; Code § 1-402) prohibits Georgia courts from applying such doctrine to citizens of other States who are nonresidents of Georgia in Federal Employers’ Liability Act cases and declining to exercise jurisdiction of such suits brought by them. Southern Railway Company v. Mayfield, supra.

Certified question is answered in the negative.

All the Justices concur. *483 Parks & Eisenberg, David S. Eisenberg, for appellant. Troutman, Sanders, Lockerman & Ashmore, Robert L. Pennington, Jeffrey R. Nickerson, for appellee. Neely, Freeman & Hawkins, Edgar A. Neely, Jr., amicus curiae.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

192 S.E.2d 382, 229 Ga. 481, 1972 Ga. LEXIS 658, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-seaboard-coast-line-railroad-ga-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack