Brown v. Scott
This text of 86 F. App'x 569 (Brown v. Scott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Bobby Joe Brown appeals the district court’s orders and judgment adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, dismissing without prejudice Brown’s civil rights complaint and denying the motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Brown v. Scott, No. CA-3-633-8-25 (D.S.C. Sept. 5 & Oct. 14, 2003). We dispense with oral argu *570 merit because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
86 F. App'x 569, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-scott-ca4-2004.