Home/Supreme Court of Georgia/Brown v. Scarborough

Brown v. Scarborough

123 S.E. 605, 158 Ga. 301, 1924 Ga. LEXIS 136
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMay 13, 1924
DocketNo. 4203
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 123 S.E. 605 (Brown v. Scarborough) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brown v. Scarborough, 123 S.E. 605, 158 Ga. 301, 1924 Ga. LEXIS 136 (Ga. 1924).

Opinions

Gilbert, J.

“Under the ruling in Miller v. Almon, 123 Ga. 104 (50 S. E. 993), in order for this exemption of $300.00 to be effectual as against a waiver, it must have been set apart.” Peppers v. Cauthen, 143 Ga. 229, 234 (84 S. E. 477). The ruling above quoted is controlling on the sole issue in the case. The court did not err in refusing to grant a temporary injunction.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concm', except Russell, O. J., dissenting. Strozier & Beaver and B. Oubbedge Snow, for plaintiff. B. W. Barnes, II. F. Bawls, and F. C. Collins, for defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wilbanks v. Wardlaw
178 S.E. 466 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1935)
Kemp v. Swainsboro Ice & Fuel Co.
169 S.E. 700 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1933)
Sanders v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.
158 S.E. 646 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
123 S.E. 605, 158 Ga. 301, 1924 Ga. LEXIS 136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-scarborough-ga-1924.