Brown v. Saul

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI GREENVILLE DIVISION

BARBARA ANN BROWN PLAINTIFF

V. NO. 4:20-CV-102-DMB-RP

ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security DEFENDANT

ORDER

On June 22, 2021, United States Magistrate Judge Roy Percy issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) in this appeal from the unfavorable decision of the Commissioner of Social Security regarding Barbara Ann Brown’s application for disability insurance benefits. Doc. #24. The R&R recommends that the decision be affirmed. Id. at 1. No objections to the R&R were filed. “With respect to those portions of the report and recommendation to which no objections were raised, the Court need only satisfy itself that there is no plain error on the face of the record.” Gauthier v. Union Pac. R.R. Co., 644 F. Supp. 2d 824, 828 (E.D. Tex. 2009) (citing Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1428–29 (5th Cir. 1996)). The Court has reviewed the R&R and finds no plain error on the face of the record. Accordingly, the R&R [24] is ADOPTED as the order of the Court. The Commissioner’s decision is AFFIRMED. SO ORDERED, this 7th day of July, 2021. /s/Debra M. Brown UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE