Brown v. Saratoga Railroad
This text of 18 N.Y. 495 (Brown v. Saratoga Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendants demurred to the complaint, and on argument the demurrer was overruled, with liberty to them to withdraw the demurrer and answer in a time limited, on payment of costs. Of this liberty the defendants have availed themselves, and they have thereby [496]*496abandoned their demurrer as such. They might still, at the trial, have raised such objections as could have been raised at a trial, after answer, if no demurrer had ever been interposed; but if they desired to present the other questions arising on the demurrer they should not have availed themselves of the leave to answer. In that case final judgment would have been rendered on the demurrer, and on appeal from that judgment all the questions raised by the demurrer would have been presented to the appellate court. When a pleading is amended, the original pleading ceases to be a part of the record, because the party pleading, having the power, has elected to make the change. It is upon the same principle that this demurrer, which has been abandoned by the defendants, is no longer a part of the record. It was, therefore, not only unnecessary but improper to insert in the roll the demurrer and the orders thereon, and the motion to strike them out must be granted.
Motion granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
18 N.Y. 495, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-saratoga-railroad-ny-1859.