Brown v. Saratoga Railroad

18 N.Y. 495
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 15, 1859
StatusPublished
Cited by19 cases

This text of 18 N.Y. 495 (Brown v. Saratoga Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brown v. Saratoga Railroad, 18 N.Y. 495 (N.Y. 1859).

Opinion

Johnson, Ch. J

The defendants demurred to the complaint, and on argument the demurrer was overruled, with liberty to them to withdraw the demurrer and answer in a time limited, on payment of costs. Of this liberty the defendants have availed themselves, and they have thereby [496]*496abandoned their demurrer as such. They might still, at the trial, have raised such objections as could have been raised at a trial, after answer, if no demurrer had ever been interposed; but if they desired to present the other questions arising on the demurrer they should not have availed themselves of the leave to answer. In that case final judgment would have been rendered on the demurrer, and on appeal from that judgment all the questions raised by the demurrer would have been presented to the appellate court. When a pleading is amended, the original pleading ceases to be a part of the record, because the party pleading, having the power, has elected to make the change. It is upon the same principle that this demurrer, which has been abandoned by the defendants, is no longer a part of the record. It was, therefore, not only unnecessary but improper to insert in the roll the demurrer and the orders thereon, and the motion to strike them out must be granted.

Motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McCargo v. . Jergens
99 N.E. 838 (New York Court of Appeals, 1912)
Everett v. Usona Stamping Works
123 N.Y.S. 106 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1910)
Fulton County Gas & Electric Co. v. Hudson River Telephone Co.
130 A.D. 343 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1909)
Village of Chester v. Leonard
37 A. 397 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1897)
Gettings v. Buchanan
44 P. 77 (Montana Supreme Court, 1896)
Denver & Rio Grande Railroad v. Wheatley
7 Colo. App. 284 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 1896)
McCullough v. Pence
32 N.Y.S. 986 (New York Supreme Court, 1895)
Campbell v. Haverhill
155 U.S. 610 (Supreme Court, 1895)
Dexter v. Dustin
24 N.Y.S. 129 (New York Supreme Court, 1893)
Seawell v. Crawford
55 F. 729 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio, 1893)
Wells v. Applegate
6 P. 770 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1885)
Hershfield & Bro. v. Aiken
3 Mont. 442 (Montana Supreme Court, 1880)
Wheelock v. . Lee
74 N.Y. 495 (New York Court of Appeals, 1878)
Wheelock v. Lee
5 Abb. N. Cas. 72 (New York City Court, 1878)
Mills v. Miller
2 Neb. 299 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1873)
Yates v. French
25 Wis. 661 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1870)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 N.Y. 495, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-saratoga-railroad-ny-1859.