Brown v. Rutledge

435 S.E.2d 187, 263 Ga. 470
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 20, 1993
DocketS93A0900
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 435 S.E.2d 187 (Brown v. Rutledge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brown v. Rutledge, 435 S.E.2d 187, 263 Ga. 470 (Ga. 1993).

Opinion

Per curiam.

Brown sued Rutledge in the Magistrate Court of Clayton County. After the magistrate court dismissed his complaint, Brown appealed to the State Court of Clayton County. The State Court granted summary judgment to Rutledge. The Court of Appeals dismissed Brown’s application for discretionary appeal “inasmuch as there is a direct right of appeal from the grant of summary judgment.” Brown v. Rutledge, Case No. A92D0374 (Ct. App. Oct. 28, 1992). This court granted Brown’s petition for certiorari.

We reverse the holding of the Court of Appeals. OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (11) provides that appeals from the “decisions of the state courts reviewing the decisions of magistrate courts by de novo proceedings” shall be made by application for discretionary appeal. It is immaterial in this instance that Brown’s appeal was from the grant of a summary judgment. We, therefore, remand the case to the Court of Appeals for consideration of the application for appeal on its merits.

Judgment reversed and case remanded.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Carlos H. Henriquez v. Tamara Barnett
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2022

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
435 S.E.2d 187, 263 Ga. 470, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-rutledge-ga-1993.