Brown v. Rusk County
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS No. 6:19-cv-00518 Jimmie Lewis Brown, Plaintiff, V. Rusk County, Defendant. Before BARKER, District Judge ORDER On this day, the court considered the findings of fact and recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell regarding Plaintiff's civil rights lawsuit. Having conducted a proceeding in the form and manner prescribed by 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1) and (3), the magistrate judge recommended that the lawsuit be dismissed with prej- udice until such time as plaintiff can show that his conviction has been overturned, expunged by executive order, declared invalid in a state collateral proceeding, or called into question through the issuance of a federal writ of habeas corpus. Doc. 14. The plaintiff received a copy of this report on April 23, 2020. Doc. 16. No objections have been filed. Upon review, the court finds no clear error. Douglass v. United Servs, Auto. Ass'n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1430 (Sth Cir. 1996) (en banc) (cleaned up). Therefore, the findings of fact and recommendation of the magistrate judge are adopted as the opinion of the court. Fur- thermore, the above-styled civil action is dismissed with prejudice until such time as the plaintiff can show that his conviction has been overturned, expunged by executive or- der, declared invalid in a state collateral proceeding, or called into question through the issuance of a federal writ of habeas corpus. Any other motions which may be pending in this civil
action are hereby denied as moot. The clerk of court is di- rected to close the case. So ordered by the court on May 27, 2020.
CAMPBELL BARKER United States District Judge
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brown v. Rusk County (Brown v. Rusk County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.