Brown v. Rosenson
This text of 164 A.D. 956 (Brown v. Rosenson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, upon the ground that the uncontradicted evidence is that the defendants falsely represented as to the car “that they were thoroughly acquainted with it and knew its condition and that the machinery was in perfect condition and would need no repairing, and that said automobile needed no overhauling.” Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
164 A.D. 956, 149 N.Y.S. 1073, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-rosenson-nyappdiv-1914.