Brown v. Rosario

272 A.D.2d 205, 708 N.Y.S.2d 291, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5630
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 18, 2000·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

—Order, Family Court, New York County (Sheldon Rand, J.), entered on or about October 6, 1997, which, after a hearing, denied petitioner mother’s application for custody of the subject child and awarded custody of the child to respondent father, with provision for visitation by petitioner mother, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

We perceive no basis to disturb the challenged custody determination, particularly since the determination, premised largely on the hearing court’s credibility findings, is entitled to our deference (see, Matter of Clara L. v Paul M., 251 AD2d 22). The record shows that respondent has been successful in providing a stable and comfortable home for the parties’ child and, accordingly, sufficiently supports the hearing court’s conclusion that it is in the child’s best interests for her to continue in respondent father’s care and custody and for the mother to have visitation as prescribed by the court’s order. Allegations of failure to provide such visitation may be addressed by the court in a renewal hearing on the issue of custody. Concur — Ellerin, J. P., Wallach, Lerner and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. Rosario, 272 A.D.2d 205, 708 N.Y.S.2d 291, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5630 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

272 A.D.2d 205 (Brown v. Rosario) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of K.G. v. C.H.
2018 NY Slip Op 4683 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Arrufat v. Bhikhi
101 A.D.3d 441 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Zayas v. Barr
304 A.D.2d 671 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)