Brown v. Rome Railway & Light Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Brown v. Rome Railway & Light Co.

111 S.E. 211, 28 Ga. App. 295, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 460

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMarch 7, 1922

Docket12745

StatusPublished

This text of 111 S.E. 211 (Brown v. Rome Railway & Light Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brown v. Rome Railway & Light Co., 111 S.E. 211, 28 Ga. App. 295, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 460 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

Bloodwokth, J.

When considered in connection with all the evidence and • in the light of the entire charge of the court, there is no reversible error either in the excerpts from the charge, or in the failure to give certain-[296]*296instructions, or in the rulings of the court on the evidence as complained of in the motion for a new trial.

Decided March 7, 1922.

Action for damages; from city court of Floyd county — Judge Nunnally. July 33, 1931.

Willingham, Wright & Covington, Nathan Harris, for plaintiff. L. A. Dean, Lamar Camp, for defendant.

There is ample evidence to support the verdict, which has the approval of the trial judge.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI