Brown v. Robison

Texas Commission of Appeals

Brown v. Robison

17 S.W.2d 766

CourtTexas Commission of Appeals

DecidedJune 5, 1929

DocketNo. 1295-5369

StatusPublished

This text of 17 S.W.2d 766 (Brown v. Robison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Commission of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brown v. Robison, 17 S.W.2d 766 (Tex. Super. Ct. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

HARVEY, P. T.

In this case, the relators, with leave of the Supreme Court, filed application for mandamus against T. T. Robison, state land commissioner. The respondent has filed a motion to withdraw such leave to file and to dismiss the application. The question arising on said motion is essentially the same as that involved in the motion to dismiss the case of Guenther v. Robison (Tex. Com. App.) 17 S.W.(2d) 765, this day decided. The holding in that case controls the disposition of this motion.

We recommend that the leave heretofore granted relators to file the application for mandamus herein be withdrawn, and the application dismissed.

CURETON, C. T. The opinion of the Commission of Appeals is adopted, and application for mandamus is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HARVEY, P. T.

In this case, the relators, with leave of the Supreme Court, filed application for mandamus against T. T. Robison, state land commissioner. The respondent has filed a motion to withdraw such leave to file and to dismiss the application. The question arising on said motion is essentially the same as that involved in the motion to dismiss the case of Guenther v. Robison (Tex. Com. App.) 17 S.W.(2d) 765, this day decided. The holding in that case controls the disposition of this motion.

We recommend that the leave heretofore granted relators to file the application for mandamus herein be withdrawn, and the application dismissed.

CURETON, C. T. The opinion of the Commission of Appeals is adopted, and application for mandamus is dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

17 S.W.2d 766, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-robison-texcommnapp-1929.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack