Brown v. Roberts & Foote
This text of 19 Ga. 424 (Brown v. Roberts & Foote) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By the Court.
delivering the opinion.
[1.] The two. cases above stated, depending on the same-point, were consolidated.
The Judge, in our judgment, very properly refused to sanction the wilts of certiorari. The processes bore test properly. The Act has reference to process issued from the Superior and Inferior Courts. The Superior' Courts have but-one Judge; the Inferior Courts have, five Justices. There-might have been some plausibility in the exception, if the.Statute had declared that the process should bear test in the • name of the Judge or Justices of such Court. Instead of that, it directs that it shall bear test in the name of one of' the Judges or Justices of such Court.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
19 Ga. 424, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-roberts-foote-ga-1856.