Brown v. Riley

370 A.2d 1289, 117 R.I. 1000, 1977 R.I. LEXIS 1845
Supreme Court of Rhode Island·Decided March 18, 1977·No. Appeal No. 76-62·Published

Opinion

Case is assigned to the calendar for April 4, 1977 at 9:30 a.m., for oral argument. The appellant will be expected to show cause why her appeal should not be summarily disposed of because it is the appeal of an order interlocutory in nature and not an appealable order. Maloney v. Daley, 115 R.I. 375, 346 A.2d 120 (1975), but see Giarrusso v. Corrigan, 108 R.I. 471, 276 A.2d 750 (1971); and because the appellant’s motion to intervene failed to comply with Super. R. Civ. P. 24(c), in that it neither contained the grounds which would entitle appellant to intervene nor was it accom[1001] panied by a pleading setting forth the claim for which intervention was sought.

Edwards efe Angelí, Joseph V. Cavanagh, Jr., for plaintiffs-appellees. Kirshenbaum & Kirshenbaum, Albert John Mainelli, for defendants-appellants.

The appellant is also directed to file a transcript of the hearing before the Superior Court on the motion to intervene and the judge’s decision, if there are such transcripts. Bevilacqua, C.J. not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. Riley, 370 A.2d 1289, 117 R.I. 1000, 1977 R.I. LEXIS 1845 (R.I. 1977).

370 A.2d 1289 (Brown v. Riley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Giarrusso v. Corrigan
276 A.2d 750 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1971)
Maloney v. Daley
346 A.2d 120 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1975)