Brown v. Riley

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Brown v. Riley

370 A.2d 1289, 117 R.I. 1000, 1977 R.I. LEXIS 1845

CourtSupreme Court of Rhode Island

DecidedMarch 18, 1977

DocketAppeal No. 76-62

StatusPublished

This text of 370 A.2d 1289 (Brown v. Riley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brown v. Riley, 370 A.2d 1289, 117 R.I. 1000, 1977 R.I. LEXIS 1845 (R.I. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

Case is assigned to the calendar for April 4, 1977 at 9:30 a.m., for oral argument. The appellant will be expected to show cause why her appeal should not be summarily disposed of because it is the appeal of an order interlocutory in nature and not an appealable order. Maloney v. Daley, 115 R.I. 375, 346 A.2d 120 (1975), but see Giarrusso v. Corrigan, 108 R.I. 471, 276 A.2d 750 (1971); and because the appellant’s motion to intervene failed to comply with Super. R. Civ. P. 24(c), in that it neither contained the grounds which would entitle appellant to intervene nor was it accom[1001]*1001panied by a pleading setting forth the claim for which intervention was sought.

Edwards efe Angelí, Joseph V. Cavanagh, Jr., for plaintiffs-appellees. Kirshenbaum & Kirshenbaum, Albert John Mainelli, for defendants-appellants.

The appellant is also directed to file a transcript of the hearing before the Superior Court on the motion to intervene and the judge’s decision, if there are such transcripts. Bevilacqua, C.J. not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Case is assigned to the calendar for April 4, 1977 at 9:30 a.m., for oral argument. The appellant will be expected to show cause why her appeal should not be summarily disposed of because it is the appeal of an order interlocutory in nature and not an appealable order. Maloney v. Daley, 115 R.I. 375, 346 A.2d 120 (1975), but see Giarrusso v. Corrigan, 108 R.I. 471, 276 A.2d 750 (1971); and because the appellant’s motion to intervene failed to comply with Super. R. Civ. P. 24(c), in that it neither contained the grounds which would entitle appellant to intervene nor was it accom[1001]*1001panied by a pleading setting forth the claim for which intervention was sought.

Edwards efe Angelí, Joseph V. Cavanagh, Jr., for plaintiffs-appellees. Kirshenbaum & Kirshenbaum, Albert John Mainelli, for defendants-appellants.

The appellant is also directed to file a transcript of the hearing before the Superior Court on the motion to intervene and the judge’s decision, if there are such transcripts. Bevilacqua, C.J. not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

370 A.2d 1289, 117 R.I. 1000, 1977 R.I. LEXIS 1845, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-riley-ri-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack