Brown v. Rigazzi's, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Brown v. Rigazzi's, Inc.

848 S.W.2d 1, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1712, 1992 WL 332589

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 17, 1992·No. No. 61074·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff appeals after the jury returned a verdict for defendant in his case for damages allegedly resulting from injuries suffered following food poisoning. We affirm. No error of law appears and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff appeals after the jury returned a verdict for defendant in his case for damages allegedly resulting from injuries suffered following food poisoning. We affirm. No error of law appears and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Brown v. Rigazzi's, Inc., 848 S.W.2d 1, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1712, 1992 WL 332589 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

848 S.W.2d 1 (Brown v. Rigazzi's, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.