Brown v. Rice
51 Cal. 489
Opinion
1. We are of opinion that the defendant must be considered to have been a “toll gatherer” within the intent of [491] the statute, and that the complaint in this respect stated a cause of action against him.
2. But we also think that the several causes of action found in the complaint, though separately stated, were improperly united. (Code Civil Procedure, Sec. 427.)
Judgment reversed and cause remanded, with directions to sustain the demurrer to the complaint.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brown v. Rice, 51 Cal. 489 (Cal. 1876).
51 Cal. 489 (Brown v. Rice) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Washington-Alaska Bank v. Stewart
184 F. 673 (Ninth Circuit, 1911)
Reynolds v. Lincoln
12 P. 449 (California Supreme Court, 1886)
State v. Yellow Jacket Silver Mining Co.
14 Nev. 220 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1879)