Brown v. Remington
This text of 7 Wis. 462 (Brown v. Remington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[464]*464 By the Court,
This cause was submitted without argument by either party, and without even a brief by the plaintiffs in error. We therefore do not know what errors they complain of, nor upon what they rely to reverse the judgment. We have, however, examined the record, but have failed to discover any error which would justify the reversal of the judgment. There is no bill of exceptions, and we must therefore suppose that nothing occurred at the trial of the case to which the plaintiffs in error take exception. The declaration we think sets out a good cause of action. (See 1 Starkie on Slander, 157 ; Cooper vs. Greeley et al., 1 Denio, 347; Cramer vs. Noonan, 4 Wis. Rep., 231. We must therefore affirm the judgment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
7 Wis. 462, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-remington-wis-1859.