Brown v. Reed

CourtCourt of Appeals of South Carolina
DecidedSeptember 11, 2013
Docket2013-UP-357
StatusUnpublished

This text of Brown v. Reed (Brown v. Reed) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brown v. Reed, (S.C. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Joseph Brown, Respondent,

v.

Roger Reed, Jr., individually and d/b/a Triple R Construction, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2011-191610

Appeal From Sumter County R. Ferrell Cothran, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2013-UP-357 Submitted August 1, 2013 – Filed September 11, 2013

APPEAL DISMISSED

William E. DuRant, Jr., of Schwartz McLeod DuRant & Jordan, of Sumter, for Appellant.

Joseph Brown, pro se, of Sumter.

PER CURIAM: Dismissed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: S.C. Code Ann. § 14-3-330 (1976 & Supp. 2012) (providing this court has appellate jurisdiction to review final judgments and interlocutory orders (1) involving the merits or (2) affecting a substantial right when the order "in effect determines the action and prevents a judgment from which an appeal might be taken or discontinues the action"); Edwards v. SunCom, 369 S.C. 91, 94, 631 S.E.2d 529, 530 (2006) ("An order which involves the merits [under section 14-3- 330(1) of the South Carolina Code (1976)] is one that 'must finally determine some substantial matter forming the whole or a part of some cause of action or defense.'" (quoting Mid-State Distribs. v. Century Imps., Inc., 310 S.C. 330, 334, 426 S.E.2d 777, 780 (1993))); Peterkin v. Brigman, 319 S.C. 367, 368, 461 S.E.2d 809, 810 (1995) (stating that for an order to be appealable under section 14-3-330(2) of the South Carolina Code (1976), the order must involve a substantial right and prevent a judgment from which an appeal may be taken); Thornton v. S.C. Elec. & Gas Corp., 391 S.C. 297, 304, 705 S.E.2d 475, 479 (Ct. App. 2011) (noting an order affects a substantial right, as the term is used in section 14-3-330(2) of the South Carolina Code (1976), "if the order removes a material issue from the case, thereby preventing the issue from being litigated on the merits, and preventing the party from seeking to correct any errors in the order during or after trial").

APPEAL DISMISSED.1

HUFF, GEATHERS, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mid-State Distributors, Inc. v. Century Importers, Inc.
426 S.E.2d 777 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1993)
Edwards v. SunCom
631 S.E.2d 529 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2006)
Peterkin v. Brigman
461 S.E.2d 809 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1995)
Thornton v. South Carolina Electric & Gas Corp. (SCE & G)
705 S.E.2d 475 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Brown v. Reed, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-reed-scctapp-2013.