Brown v. Ratledge

669 F. App'x 101
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 28, 2016
DocketNo. 16-6082
StatusPublished

This text of 669 F. App'x 101 (Brown v. Ratledge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brown v. Ratledge, 669 F. App'x 101 (4th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Joseph A. Brown appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), for failure to comply with a court order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brown v. Ratledge, No. 7:15-cv-00640-EKD-RSD (W.D. Va. Dec. 18, 2015). We deny as moot Brown’s motion to expedite his appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this [102]*102court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
669 F. App'x 101, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-ratledge-ca4-2016.