Brown v. Radmanesh

Missouri Court of Appeals

Brown v. Radmanesh

214 S.W.3d 413, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 290, 2007 WL 509765

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 20, 2007·No. No. ED 87923·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiffs, Jerry Brown, Sr. and his children, appeal the judgment entered by the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis following a jury verdict against them and in favor of the defendant, Rebekah Rad-manesh, M.D., in the plaintiffs’ wrongful-death action filed in connection with Tyrone Brown’s murder of Vanilla Brown. Finding no error, we affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

The trial court’s judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(5).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiffs, Jerry Brown, Sr. and his children, appeal the judgment entered by the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis following a jury verdict against them and in favor of the defendant, Rebekah Rad-manesh, M.D., in the plaintiffs’ wrongful-death action filed in connection with Tyrone Brown’s murder of Vanilla Brown. Finding no error, we affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

The trial court’s judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(5).

Brown v. Radmanesh, 214 S.W.3d 413, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 290, 2007 WL 509765 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

214 S.W.3d 413 (Brown v. Radmanesh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.