Brown v. Quattlebaum
This text of Brown v. Quattlebaum (Brown v. Quattlebaum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7254
VERNON SAMUEL BROWN, a/k/a Vernon S. Brown,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ANTONIO QUATTLEBAUM, Detention Officer,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (9:08-cv-02225-GRA)
Submitted: October 15, 2009 Decided: October 22, 2009
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Vernon Samuel Brown, Appellant Pro Se. William Henry Davidson, II, Joel Steve Hughes, DAVIDSON & LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Vernon Samuel Brown appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006)
complaint for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Brown v. Quattlebaum, No. 9:08-cv-02225-GRA (D.S.C. Mar.
13, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Brown v. Quattlebaum, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-quattlebaum-ca4-2009.