Brown v. Przebowski
This text of 14 A.D.2d 812 (Brown v. Przebowski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In view of the plaintiff’s failure to set forth .any facts showing merit in her action or excusing her delay in the prosecution thereof, it was an improvident exercise of discretion not to grant the motion unconditionally (cf. Moebus v. Tishman Co., 5 A D 2d 786; Topp v. Casco Prods. Corp., 8 A D 2d 727). Nolan, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
14 A.D.2d 812, 221 N.Y.S.2d 256, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8235, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-przebowski-nyappdiv-1961.