Brown v. Pollard

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Brown v. Pollard

29 Ky. 116, 6 J.J. Marsh. 116, 1831 Ky. LEXIS 138

DecidedJune 7, 1831

StatusPublished

This text of 29 Ky. 116 (Brown v. Pollard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brown v. Pollard, 29 Ky. 116, 6 J.J. Marsh. 116, 1831 Ky. LEXIS 138 (Ky. Ct. App. 1831).

Pincite

Opinions

Chief Justice Robertson,

delivered the'opinion of the court. It. seems to this court, there is no error in the judgment of the circuit court. There being no plea of sel-ojf or notice of set-off, and there, being no proof which would have been admissible under such a plea or notice; the defendant was entitled to a judgement for costs according to.the provisions of the act of 1827, increasing the jurisdiction of magistrates,. Because the plaintiff sued in covenant and recovered les.- tüan $'50.

Judgment affirmed.

Petition for a re-hearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chief Justice Robertson,

delivered the'opinion of the court. It. seems to this court, there is no error in the judgment of the circuit court. There being no plea of sel-ojf or notice of set-off, and there, being no proof which would have been admissible under such a plea or notice; the defendant was entitled to a judgement for costs according to.the provisions of the act of 1827, increasing the jurisdiction of magistrates,. Because the plaintiff sued in covenant and recovered les.- tüan $'50.

Judgment affirmed.

Petition for a re-hearing.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

29 Ky. 116, 6 J.J. Marsh. 116, 1831 Ky. LEXIS 138, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-pollard-kyctapp-1831.