Brown v. Pioneer Union Elementary School District
This text of Brown v. Pioneer Union Elementary School District (Brown v. Pioneer Union Elementary School District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 P.R.V., a minor, by and through Guardian Case No. 1:24-cv-01239-KES-BAM Ad Litem EUFEMIA SAMANTHA 10 VALDEZ, ORDER GRANTING PETITION OF EUFEMIA SAMANTHA VALDEZ FOR 11 Plaintiff, APPOINTMENT AS GUARDIAN AD LITEM FOR PLAINTIFF P.R.V. 12 v. (Doc. 10) 13 PIONEER UNION ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al, 14 Defendants. 15 16 Currently before the Court is the petition of Eufemia Samantha Valdez to be appointed as 17 guardian ad litem for Plaintiff P.R.V., a minor. (Doc. 10.)1 18 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 17 provides that “[t]he court must appoint a guardian ad 19 litem—or issue another appropriate order—to protect a minor or incompetent person who is 20 unrepresented in an action.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 17(c)(2). This requires a district court to take 21 whatever measures it deems proper to protect the individual during litigation. United States v. 22 30.64 Acres of Land, 795 F.2d 796, 805 (9th Cir. 1986). In pertinent part, Local Rule 202(a) of 23 this Court further states:
24 Upon commencement of an action or upon initial appearance in defense of an action by or on behalf of a minor or incompetent person, the attorney representing the 25
1 The Court notes that the initial complaint included Plaintiff’s full name and listed the guardian 26 ad litem as “Samantha Brown,” whereas Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint lists the minor 27 Plaintiff as P.R.V. and the guardian ad litem as “Eufemia Samantha Valdez.” (Docs. 1, 9.) The Court refers to Plaintiff and Plaintiff’s guardian ad litem as named in Plaintiff’s First Amended 28 Complaint (Doc. 9). 1 minor or incompetent person shall present . . . a motion for the appointment of a guardian ad litem by the Court, or . . . a showing satisfactory to the Court that no 2 such appointment is necessary to ensure adequate representation of the minor or incompetent person. 3 4 See L.R. 202(a). The decision to appoint a guardian ad litem “must normally be left to the sound 5 discretion of the trial court.” 30.64 Acres, 795 F.2d at 804. 6 “[W]hen a parent brings an action on behalf of a child, and it is evident that the interests 7 of each are the same, no need exists for someone other than the parent to represent the child's 8 interests under Rule 17(c).” H.D.A. v. County of Stanislaus, No. 1:22-cv-00384-DAD-SAB, 2022 9 WL 992990, at *1 (E.D. Cal. Apr. 1, 2022) (quoting Gonzalez v. Reno, 86 F. Supp. 2d 1167, 1185 10 (S.D. Fla.), aff'd, 212 F.3d 1338 (11th Cir. 2000)); see I.W. by & through Aguirre v. Clovis 11 Unified Sch. Dist., No. 1:24-cv-01074-JLT-BAM, 2024 WL 4216753, at *1 (E.D. Cal. Sept. 17, 12 2024) (appointing mother as guardian ad litem where mother was fully competent, consented to 13 appointment, and had no interest adverse to rights of plaintiff). “While a parent is generally 14 appointed as a guardian ad litem, there are situations where the best interests of the minor and the 15 interests of the parent conflict.” H.D.A, 2022 WL 992990, at *1 (citing Anthem Life Ins. Co. v. 16 Olguin, No. 1:06-cv-01165 AWI NEW (TAG), 2007 WL 1390672, at *2 (E.D. Cal. May 9, 17 2007)). Therefore, a parent is not entitled as a matter of right to act as guardian ad litem for the 18 child. Id. 19 The Court has considered the application of Eufemia Samantha Valdez for appointment as 20 guardian ad litem for Plaintiff P.R.V. and finds no apparent conflict that would preclude Ms. 21 Valdez from serving as guardian ad litem. The application indicates that Ms. Valdez is the 22 mother of P.R.V. and has custody of her. (Doc. 10 ¶ 2.) The application further indicates that 23 Ms. Valdez is willing to serve as guardian ad litem of Plaintiff and is “fully competent to 24 understand and protect the rights of the minor and to have no interest adverse to that of the 25 minors.” (Id. ¶ 5.) 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Eufemia Samantha Valdez is appointed in 2 this action as guardian ad litem for minor Plaintiff P.R.V. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4
5 Dated: January 28, 2025 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Brown v. Pioneer Union Elementary School District, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-pioneer-union-elementary-school-district-caed-2025.