Brown v. Phœnix Utility Co.
143 S.E. 926, 195 N.C. 878, 1928 N.C. LEXIS 252
Opinion
A careful perusal of the record leaves us with the impression that the order of removal should be upheld on authority of Cox v. Lumber Co., 193 N. C., 28, 136 S. E., 254. The principles announced in Crisp v. Fibre Co., 193 N. C., 77, 136 S. E., 238, cited by plaintiff, are also in support of his Honor’s ruling.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brown v. Phœnix Utility Co., 143 S.E. 926, 195 N.C. 878, 1928 N.C. LEXIS 252 (N.C. 1928).
143 S.E. 926 (Brown v. Phœnix Utility Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cox v. Whitmer-Parsons Pulp & Lumber Co.
136 S.E. 254 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1927)
Crisp v. Champion Fibre Co.
136 S.E. 238 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1927)