Brown v. Pennsylvania Parole Board
This text of Brown v. Pennsylvania Parole Board (Brown v. Pennsylvania Parole Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
TIMOTHY BROWN, : CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:24-CV-816 : Petitioner : (Judge Conner) : v. : : PENNSYLVANIA PAROLE : BOARD, et al., : : Respondents :
ORDER
AND NOW, this 27th day of September, 2024, upon consideration of the petition (Doc. 1) for writ of habeas corpus, and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The petition (Doc. 1) for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED with prejudice as untimely.
2. A certificate of appealability will not issue because jurists of reason would not debate the correctness of this procedural ruling. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000).
3. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.
/S/ CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER Christopher C. Conner United States District Judge Middle District of Pennsylvania
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Brown v. Pennsylvania Parole Board, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-pennsylvania-parole-board-pamd-2024.