Brown v. Pennsylvania Parole Board

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania·Decided September 27, 2024·No. 1:24-cv-00816·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

TIMOTHY BROWN, : CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:24-CV-816 : Petitioner : (Judge Conner) : v. : : PENNSYLVANIA PAROLE : BOARD, et al., : : Respondents :

ORDER

AND NOW, this 27th day of September, 2024, upon consideration of the petition (Doc. 1) for writ of habeas corpus, and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The petition (Doc. 1) for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED with prejudice as untimely.

2. A certificate of appealability will not issue because jurists of reason would not debate the correctness of this procedural ruling. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000).

3. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.

/S/ CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER Christopher C. Conner United States District Judge Middle District of Pennsylvania

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. Pennsylvania Parole Board, (M.D. Pa. 2024).

Brown v. Pennsylvania Parole Board (Brown v. Pennsylvania Parole Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Slack v. McDaniel
529 U.S. 473 (Supreme Court, 2000)