Brown v. Paul
164 P. 290, 101 Kan. 87, 1917 Kan. LEXIS 24
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brown v. Paul. Read the opinion of the Court — 100 Kan. 319 →
Opinion
The opinion of the court was delivered by
The former order was made on the theory that the controversy might be adjusted. But the defendants have moved for leave to answer, and the cause will therefore be remanded for further proceedings in accordance with the former opinion, including leave to answer as to Clara A. Kasbeer. The motion for rehearing is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brown v. Paul, 164 P. 290, 101 Kan. 87, 1917 Kan. LEXIS 24 (kan 1917).
164 P. 290 (Brown v. Paul) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.