Brown v. Patrick

Fourth Circuit

Brown v. Patrick

471 F. App'x 111

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 3, 2012·No. No. 11-7580·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Jevon Edward Brown appeals the district court’s order denying his self-styled motion for permission to appeal, which the district court construed as a Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion, and has filed motions for appointment of counsel and for a transcript at government expense. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Brown’s motions and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brown v. Patrick, No. 1:08-cv-01345-TSE-TRJ (E.D. Va. filed Nov. 2, 2011; entered Nov. 3, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Jevon Edward Brown appeals the district court’s order denying his self-styled motion for permission to appeal, which the district court construed as a Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion, and has filed motions for appointment of counsel and for a transcript at government expense. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Brown’s motions and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brown v. Patrick, No. 1:08-cv-01345-TSE-TRJ (E.D. Va. filed Nov. 2, 2011; entered Nov. 3, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Brown v. Patrick, 471 F. App'x 111 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

471 F. App'x 111 (Brown v. Patrick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.