Brown v. Patrick

Fourth Circuit

Brown v. Patrick

352 F. App'x 818

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 23, 2009·No. No. 09-7157·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jevon Edward Brown appeals the district court’s order denying what it construed to be a Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration of the district court’s February 24, 2009 order dismissing Brown’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action against Defendants. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brown v. Patrick, 1:08-cv-01345-TSE-TRJ (E.D.Va. Apr. 20, 2009). We dispense with oral argument [819]*819because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jevon Edward Brown appeals the district court’s order denying what it construed to be a Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration of the district court’s February 24, 2009 order dismissing Brown’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action against Defendants. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brown v. Patrick, 1:08-cv-01345-TSE-TRJ (E.D.Va. Apr. 20, 2009). We dispense with oral argument [819]*819because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Brown v. Patrick, 352 F. App'x 818 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

352 F. App'x 818 (Brown v. Patrick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related