Brown v. Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. of California

Fifth Circuit

Brown v. Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. of California

8 F.2d 996, 1925 U.S. App. LEXIS 3432

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedNovember 25, 1925

Docket4519

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 8 F.2d 996 (Brown v. Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. of California) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brown v. Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. of California, 8 F.2d 996, 1925 U.S. App. LEXIS 3432 (5th Cir. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

FOSTER, Circuit Judge.

This is a suit on a policy of accident insurance which provided for double indemnity if the bodily injury was sustained “while in or on a public conveyance (including the platform, steps, or running board thereof) provided by a common carrier for passenger service.” The insured was killed in an aeroplane accident, while a passenger in said plane. Suit was brought for double indemnity, claimed by virtue of the above-quoted clause. The defendant admitted liability for the face value of the policy and tendered that amount, which was declined by plaintiff. At the close of the case the District Court directed a verdict for plaintiff for the amount tendered, denying the claim for double indemnity.

The following facts are not disputed: Lieutenant Whitted, formerly in the naval aviation service, owned a hydroaeroplane and operated it himself at Camp Walton, Fla., a summer resort, where he took passengers on pleasure trips in the air to let them enjoy the doubtful pleasure of flying. The plane held six persons, ineluding the pilot. The trips lasted about 10 minutes in the air, and the plane returned to the point from which it started, for which he charged his passengers $5 each. He would not go up with, less than three passengers and carried only white people. He operated on such days, at such hours, and under such conditions as pleased him, and did not pretend to maintain regular schedules. He did not advertise his business, unless keeping his plane anchored at the resort and having his helper in the vicinity of the usual landing place to give information could be so called. On August 19, 1923, Hugh D. Brown, the insured, who was visiting Camp Walton with his wife, went up with Whitted and three others. When up in the air, something went wrong with the machine; it fell, and all were killed.

From the above-quoted facts, it is clear that Whitted was not a common carrier. He assumed no duty to the public to carry them, and if he refused to do so without any reason at all no action would lie against him. See Hutchinson on Carriers (3d Ed.) §§ 47, 48.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FOSTER, Circuit Judge.

This is a suit on a policy of accident insurance which provided for double indemnity if the bodily injury was sustained “while in or on a public conveyance (including the platform, steps, or running board thereof) provided by a common carrier for passenger service.” The insured was killed in an aeroplane accident, while a passenger in said plane. Suit was brought for double indemnity, claimed by virtue of the above-quoted clause. The defendant admitted liability for the face value of the policy and tendered that amount, which was declined by plaintiff. At the close of the case the District Court directed a verdict for plaintiff for the amount tendered, denying the claim for double indemnity.

The following facts are not disputed: Lieutenant Whitted, formerly in the naval aviation service, owned a hydroaeroplane and operated it himself at Camp Walton, Fla., a summer resort, where he took passengers on pleasure trips in the air to let them enjoy the doubtful pleasure of flying. The plane held six persons, ineluding the pilot. The trips lasted about 10 minutes in the air, and the plane returned to the point from which it started, for which he charged his passengers $5 each. He would not go up with, less than three passengers and carried only white people. He operated on such days, at such hours, and under such conditions as pleased him, and did not pretend to maintain regular schedules. He did not advertise his business, unless keeping his plane anchored at the resort and having his helper in the vicinity of the usual landing place to give information could be so called. On August 19, 1923, Hugh D. Brown, the insured, who was visiting Camp Walton with his wife, went up with Whitted and three others. When up in the air, something went wrong with the machine; it fell, and all were killed.

From the above-quoted facts, it is clear that Whitted was not a common carrier. He assumed no duty to the public to carry them, and if he refused to do so without any reason at all no action would lie against him. See Hutchinson on Carriers (3d Ed.) §§ 47, 48.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 F.2d 996, 1925 U.S. App. LEXIS 3432, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-pacific-mut-life-ins-co-of-california-ca5-1925.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack