Brown v. Osborne

New York Supreme Court

Brown v. Osborne

2 Cow. 457

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 15, 1824

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 2 Cow. 457 (Brown v. Osborne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brown v. Osborne, 2 Cow. 457 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1824).

Pincite

Opinion

Curia.

We think the office became vacant by the ap p0intments under the act of 1823. The second proviso in the 4th section of this act, that nothing in that section shall , , . . T . . apply to commissioners m the cities, relates merely to the mode of appointment, and excludes them from the operation of the second proviso. When new commissioners were appointed for the city, under the first section of that act, the old commissioners went out of office, by the ninth article of the constitution.

Motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Curia.

We think the office became vacant by the ap p0intments under the act of 1823. The second proviso in the 4th section of this act, that nothing in that section shall , , . . T . . apply to commissioners m the cities, relates merely to the mode of appointment, and excludes them from the operation of the second proviso. When new commissioners were appointed for the city, under the first section of that act, the old commissioners went out of office, by the ninth article of the constitution.

Motion granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Cow. 457, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-osborne-nysupct-1824.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack