Brown v. Osborne
This text of 1 Blackf. 32 (Brown v. Osborne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this case the record does not show the names of the judges who rendered the judgment complained of; nor does it appear from the transcript before us that there were any judges, except what may be conjectured from the statement that a judgment has been rendered. This is evidently a neglect of the clerk, but it is a defect for which the Court will not now reverse the proceedings.
A certiorari is awarded to the Gibson Circuit Court, directing them to send up a full and complete transcript of the record in this case
It is a general rule, that, at any time pending a writ of error, whether before or after errors assigned, or after in nullo est erratum, pleaded, the Court, ex officio, may award a certiorari to inform their conscience, to affirm a judgment, but not to reverse it, or make error. Franklyn v. Reeves, Cas, temp. Hardw. 118, 119. — 2 Will. Saund. 101, s, t.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Blackf. 32, 1818 Ind. LEXIS 13, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-osborne-ind-1818.