Brown v. Oklahoma City
This text of 1924 OK 1121 (Brown v. Oklahoma City) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On September 20, 1924. plaintiff in error filed his petition in error m this court seeking a reversal of an order *253 of the district court of Oklahoma county, wherein the said district court presumably vacated a temporary injunction attached to the petition in error. There is no final judgment included among the various papers attached thereto. There is no transcript of the evidence or .the pleadings. There are some original papers, apparently taken from the files of the district court, but there is nothing that approaches the case-made or transcript.
Section 783. Comp. Stat. 1921, provides that in all actions instituted by petition in error, plaintiff in error shall attach to and file with the petition in error the original case-made or a certified transcript of the record. This not having been done, this court had no jurisdiction of this proceeding.
The appeal will therefore be dismissed.
Note. — See 3 G J. § 1104; 4 C. .1. Si 2380 (1926 Anno).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1924 OK 1121, 231 P. 855, 107 Okla. 252, 1924 Okla. LEXIS 680, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-oklahoma-city-okla-1924.