Brown v. Nwakamma

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Brown v. Nwakamma

246 A.D.2d 568, 667 N.Y.S.2d 278

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 20, 1998

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 246 A.D.2d 568 (Brown v. Nwakamma) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brown v. Nwakamma, 246 A.D.2d 568, 667 N.Y.S.2d 278 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—In two actions to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant in Action No. 1 and Action No. 2 appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Huttner, J.), dated December 10, 1996, as denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing each of the complaints in Action No. 1 and Action No. 2 on the ground that neither plaintiff sustained a serious injury as defined by Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs payable to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

Triable issues of fact exist as to whether the plaintiffs sustained a serious injury as defined by Insurance Law § 5102 (d) (see, CPLR 3212 [b]). Miller, J. P., Ritter, Sullivan, Santucci and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In two actions to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant in Action No. 1 and Action No. 2 appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Huttner, J.), dated December 10, 1996, as denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing each of the complaints in Action No. 1 and Action No. 2 on the ground that neither plaintiff sustained a serious injury as defined by Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs payable to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

Triable issues of fact exist as to whether the plaintiffs sustained a serious injury as defined by Insurance Law § 5102 (d) (see, CPLR 3212 [b]). Miller, J. P., Ritter, Sullivan, Santucci and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

246 A.D.2d 568, 667 N.Y.S.2d 278, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-nwakamma-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack