Brown v. North Florida Surgeons, P.A.

141 So. 3d 1292, 2014 WL 3709736, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 11583
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brown v. North Florida Surgeons, P.A.. Read the opinion of the Court — 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 4768
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 28, 2014·No. No. 1D12-3383·Published

Opinion

ON REMAND FROM THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT

PER CURIAM.

In Brown v. North Florida Surgeons, P.A., 110 So.3d 962 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013), we affirmed the trial court’s order compelling arbitration. Appellant petitioned the Florida Supreme Court for review, and by order dated June 9, 2014, the Court quashed our decision and remanded for reconsideration upon application of Franks v. Bowers, 116 So.3d 1240 (Fla.2013). We directed the parties to show cause why the trial court’s order should not be reversed based upon Franks. The parties agree that reversal is required because the agreement containing the arbitration clause at issue in this case is the same agreement that was invalidated in Franks. Accordingly, the trial court’s order compelling arbitration is reversed and this case is remanded for further proceedings.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

VAN NORTWICK, WETHERELL, and ROWE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. North Florida Surgeons, P.A., 141 So. 3d 1292, 2014 WL 3709736, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 11583 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

141 So. 3d 1292 (Brown v. North Florida Surgeons, P.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brown v. North Florida Surgeons, P.A.
110 So. 3d 962 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)
Franks v. Bowers
116 So. 3d 1240 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2013)