Brown v. Newcastle & Richmond Railroad
This text of 9 Ind. 181 (Brown v. Newcastle & Richmond Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this case there was a motion for a new trial; but the evidence-is not set out in the record. There is no bill of exceptions; nor does it appear that the rulings of the Court were excepted to in any mode known to the law. There is, therefore, no point of inquiry properly before us
The judgment is affirmed, with 10 per cent. damages and costs.
See Irwin v. Anthony, 8 Ind. R. 470; Jolly et al. v. The Terre Haute Bridge Co., post, and cases cited.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
9 Ind. 181, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-newcastle-richmond-railroad-ind-1857.