Brown v. New York State Thruway Authority
18 Misc. 2d 431, 192 N.Y.S.2d 955, 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3178
Opinion
The defendant’s motion for permission to serve and file a counterclaim herein, as set forth in its “ Proposed Counterclaim”, is granted. (See Karpis v. Bungalow Bar Corp. of America, 8 A D 2d 844; Cardozo, C. J., in Schuylkill Fuel Corp. v. Nieberg Realty Corp., 250 N. Y. 304 [1929]; Conway, J., now Ch. J., in Smith v. Kirkpatrick, 305 N. Y. 66 [1953].)
The defendant shall serve and file its counterclaim on or before August 31,1959.
Short-form order signed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brown v. New York State Thruway Authority, 18 Misc. 2d 431, 192 N.Y.S.2d 955, 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3178 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1959).
18 Misc. 2d 431 (Brown v. New York State Thruway Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Schuylkill Fuel Corp. v. B. & C. Nieberg Realty Corp.
165 N.E. 456 (New York Court of Appeals, 1929)
Smith v. Kirkpatrick
111 N.E.2d 209 (New York Court of Appeals, 1953)