Brown v. Neithammer

4 A. 918, 2 Sadler 54, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 698
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMarch 15, 1886
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 4 A. 918 (Brown v. Neithammer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brown v. Neithammer, 4 A. 918, 2 Sadler 54, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 698 (Pa. 1886).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The court did not commit any error in entering judgment in favor of the defendant non obstante veredicto. When a married woman dies intestate, her personal estate should be distributed through administration. It is true her husband is first eu titled to letters of administration on her estate. As such administrator only can he sue for her personal estate. If she leave no children and after all her debts if any are paid, then the residue of her personal estate may be, on distribution, allotted to him. It follows that he cannot sue for her personal chattels otherwise than as her administrator.

[55]*55The learned judge therefore correctly held that this action of replevin could not be maintained.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Couch v. Thompson
142 A. 280 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 A. 918, 2 Sadler 54, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 698, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-neithammer-pa-1886.