Brown v. Napper

Michigan Supreme Court

Brown v. Napper

83 N.W. 999, 125 Mich. 117, 1900 Mich. LEXIS 677

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided October 31, 1900·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The only question involved in this case is the validity of a decree made for the delinquent taxes of 1893. The time fixed for the hearing of the petition of the auditor general was Monday, November 11, 1895. The court remained in session each day successively, up to and including Saturday, November 16th, at which time the decree was taken. Neither of the respondents appeared or objected to the entry of the decree. They now insist the decree was taken one day too soon. We think the recent cases of Gates v. Johnson, 121 Mich. 663 (80 N. W. 709), and Brown v. Mining Co., 123 Mich. 117 (81 N. W. 969), are controlling against the claim of respondents.

The decree of the court below is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The only question involved in this case is the validity of a decree made for the delinquent taxes of 1893. The time fixed for the hearing of the petition of the auditor general was Monday, November 11, 1895. The court remained in session each day successively, up to and including Saturday, November 16th, at which time the decree was taken. Neither of the respondents appeared or objected to the entry of the decree. They now insist the decree was taken one day too soon. We think the recent cases of Gates v. Johnson, 121 Mich. 663 (80 N. W. 709), and Brown v. Mining Co., 123 Mich. 117 (81 N. W. 969), are controlling against the claim of respondents.

The decree of the court below is affirmed.

Brown v. Napper, 83 N.W. 999, 125 Mich. 117, 1900 Mich. LEXIS 677 (Mich. 1900).

Pincite

83 N.W. 999 (Brown v. Napper) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related