Brown v. Nachtrieb

6 Colo. 517
CourtSupreme Court of Colorado
DecidedApril 15, 1883
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 6 Colo. 517 (Brown v. Nachtrieb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brown v. Nachtrieb, 6 Colo. 517 (Colo. 1883).

Opinion

Beck, O. J.

The rulings of the district court complained of, in and by the first and second assignments of error, involve matters of sound judicial discretion with the exercise of which we must decline to interfere.

The other errors assigned are • equally without merit. The case appears to have been fairly tried, and submitted to the jury upon a correct statement of the law applicable to the facts before it.

The verdict was warranted by the pleadings and the testimony, and a careful examination of the entire record fails to disclose any legal propositions calling for our consideration. The trial appears to have been conducted in accordance with well established legal principles, and the judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Mr. Justice Helm took no part in the decision of this cause.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Board of County Commissioners v. Schradsky
43 Colo. 84 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1908)
Gambrill v. Brown Hotel Co.
11 Colo. App. 529 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 1898)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 Colo. 517, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-nachtrieb-colo-1883.