Brown v. Muth

258 A.D. 961, 17 N.Y.S.2d 856, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8439

Opinion

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, order confirming the report of an official referee which recommended that plaintiffs’ application for a deficiency judgment be denied, and denying plaintiffs’ cross-motion to remit the matter to the official referee for a further report, unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. (Heiman v. Bishop, 272 N. Y. 83.) Present—Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. Muth, 258 A.D. 961, 17 N.Y.S.2d 856, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8439 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

258 A.D. 961 (Brown v. Muth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Heiman v. Bishop
4 N.E.2d 944 (New York Court of Appeals, 1936)