Brown v. Murray

53 Mo. App. 184
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 6, 1893·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

— For failure to comply with the Tequirements of section 2301, Revised Statutes, by filing “a clear and concise statement of the case,” and for failing to further comply with rule 15, by filing “a printed abstract or abridgment of the record,” we dismiss the appeal. Snyder v. Free, 102 Mo. 325; Craig v. Scudder, 98 Mo. 664; Jayne v. Wine, 98 Mo. 404; Long v. Long, 96 Mo. 180; Thompson v. Allen, 107 Mo. 479.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. Murray, 53 Mo. App. 184 (Mo. Ct. App. 1893).

53 Mo. App. 184 (Brown v. Murray) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Ex Rel. Kansas City Light & Power Co. v. Trimble
237 S.W. 1021 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1922)
Mills v. McDaniels
59 Mo. App. 331 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1894)