Brown v. Morris
This text of 60 F.3d 820 (Brown v. Morris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
60 F.3d 820
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Denrick Eric BROWN, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Edward C. MORRIS; William P. Roger; David A. Williams;
D.R. Guillory; Laurel A. Corner, Operations Manager;
Joseph Edmond, Adjustment Committee; B.L. Collins,
Grievance Counsel, Defendants--Appellees.
No. 94-6947.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: February 28, 1995.
Decided: July 6, 1995.
Denrick Eric Brown, appellant pro se. Pamela Anne Sargent, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, VA, for appellees.
E.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before HALL and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Brown v. Morris, No. CA-92-1192 (E.D.Va. Aug. 4, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
60 F.3d 820, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24748, 1995 WL 417922, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-morris-ca4-1995.