Brown v. Moore

116 A.D.2d 614, 497 N.Y.S.2d 702, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51479
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 21, 1986
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 116 A.D.2d 614 (Brown v. Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brown v. Moore, 116 A.D.2d 614, 497 N.Y.S.2d 702, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51479 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Opinion

— In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendant Josephine F. Moore appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Goldstein, J.), dated July 11, 1984, which denied her motion to amend her answer to include the defense of collateral estoppel and to dismiss the action against her on that ground, and (2) as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the same court, dated September 7, 1984, as, upon reargument, adhered to the original determination.

Appeal from the order dated July 11, 1984 dismissed, without costs or disbursements. That order was superseded by the order dated September 7, 1984, made upon reargument.

Order dated September 7, 1984 reversed, insofar as appealed from, on the law, without costs or disbursements, motion granted, and plaintiffs complaint against defendant Moore dismissed.

Plaintiff is collaterally estopped from relitigating defendant Moore’s involvement in the accident, as the record indicates that that issue has already been resolved in the latter’s favor in an arbitration proceeding. The mere fact that the Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation (MVAIC) is also a defendant here, having intervened in this action, does not affect defendant Moore’s right to have plaintiffs action against her dismissed on the ground of collateral estoppel (see, e.g., Greenspan v Doldorf, 87 AD2d 884; Matter of Wallace v MVAIC, 25 NY2d 384; Schwartz v Public Administrator of County of Bronx, 24 NY2d 65, 71). Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rodriguez v. Martinelli
68 A.D.3d 843 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Jedlicka v. Field
14 A.D.3d 596 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
McKenna v. Forsyth & Forsyth
280 A.D.2d 79 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Schweizer v. Mulvehill
93 F. Supp. 2d 376 (S.D. New York, 2000)
Kituskie v. Corbman
682 A.2d 378 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1996)
Alva v. Hurley, Fox, Selig, Caprari & Kelleher
156 Misc. 2d 550 (New York Supreme Court, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
116 A.D.2d 614, 497 N.Y.S.2d 702, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51479, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-moore-nyappdiv-1986.