Brown v. Minichbauer

Fourth Circuit

Brown v. Minichbauer

585 F. App'x 261

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedNovember 24, 2014

DocketNo. 14-1432

StatusPublished

This text of 585 F. App'x 261 (Brown v. Minichbauer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brown v. Minichbauer, 585 F. App'x 261 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Maress Brown appeals the district court’s order dismissing his Title VII employment discrimination action because Brown did not (a) name a proper “employer,” as that term is defined in 42 U.S.C. § 2000e(b) (2012); and (b) administratively exhaust his claims as to the two named Defendants. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Brown’s informal brief does not challenge either basis for the district court’s disposition, Brown has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Maress Brown appeals the district court’s order dismissing his Title VII employment discrimination action because Brown did not (a) name a proper “employer,” as that term is defined in 42 U.S.C. § 2000e(b) (2012); and (b) administratively exhaust his claims as to the two named Defendants. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Brown’s informal brief does not challenge either basis for the district court’s disposition, Brown has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

585 F. App'x 261, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-minichbauer-ca4-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack