Brown v. Miltimore

2 N.H. 442
CourtSuperior Court of New Hampshire
DecidedFebruary 15, 1822
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 2 N.H. 442 (Brown v. Miltimore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brown v. Miltimore, 2 N.H. 442 (N.H. Super. Ct. 1822).

Opinion

By the court.

If in this state as in Massachusetts all pleas in abatement must by law be filed on the first day of the term, at which the action is entered, we should probably be induced to follow the decisions of the courts of that state, and permit nontenure to be pleaded in bar. But in this state pleas in abatement may be filed by our rules of practice any time during the first term ; so that tenants in real actions have ample time to instruct counsel, and avail themselves of a plea of nontenure in abatement, if they see fit. On the other hand, if the tenant be not in fact tenant of the freehold, it is proper that he should be compelled to disclose that circumstance at the first term, and not be permitted to protract a suit, in which nothing can be settled. We are therefore of opinion, that there is no reason why we should depart from the rules of the common law on this subject, and that the plea in this case must be adjudged insufficient.

Judgment for the demandant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Young v. Dearborn
27 N.H. 324 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1853)
Wheeler v. Bates
21 N.H. 460 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1850)
Cocheco Manufacturing Co. v. Whittier
10 N.H. 305 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1839)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 N.H. 442, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-miltimore-nhsuperct-1822.